Links
Author’s Website : www.twitter.com/sethgs
Amazon : hardback / paperback / eBook
Add To Your GoodReads TBR list
This book in 6 words:
An interesting remix of a classic.
Why did I read this? And am I glad I did?
I read this book because Tara sent it to me. I am normally not a paranormal reader (the Soulless series is a little out of character for me), but seeing as this genre is increasingly popular these days, I think it’s important to expand my horizons. And yes, I am glad I read this.
Brief Summary
‘It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains.’ So begins Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, an expanded edition of the beloved Jane Austen novel featuring all-new scenes of bone-crunching zombie mayhem. As our story opens, a mysterious plague has fallen upon the quiet English village of Meryton and the dead are returning to life! Feisty heroine Elizabeth Bennet is determined to wipe out the zombie menace, but she’s soon distracted by the arrival of the haughty and arrogant Mr. Darcy. What ensues is a delightful comedy of manners with plenty of civilized sparring between the two young lovers and even more violent sparring on the blood-soaked battlefield as Elizabeth wages war against hordes of flesh-eating undead. Can she vanquish the spawn of Satan? And overcome the social prejudices of the class-conscious landed gentry? Complete with romance, heartbreak, swordfights, cannibalism, and thousands of rotting corpses, Pride and Prejudice and Zombies transforms a masterpiece of world literature into something you’d actually want to read.
(via Amazon)
Plot/Pacing/Writing Style
This section is perhaps a little bit harder to talk about since the book is basically Pride and Prejudice with zombies worked in. I will say that the way Grahame-Smith zombified (if this is not yet a word, it should be) this book is quite masterful. He creates a Pride and Prejudice type world that seems plausible. It has been a very long time since I have read the original Pride and Prejudice, so I have to admit that while I am only somewhat familiar with the general story line, and therefore not really sure how much of Austen’s classic remains intact and how much of it has been altered. Because it is still written in the style of the original, reading and understanding some of the archaic phrases and language usage can be difficult, though not enough to actually detract from the book itself. Getting into this book took awhile; though I read most of it over the weekend, I started it a few weeks ago.
Characters
The original Austen characters have been turned into warriors. There is a question in the “discussion guide” at the back of the book that asks about the “dual nature” of Elizabeth; she is both sweet and a killer. But this dual nature of Elizabeth – or of any of the characters – did not seem unnatural. They were warriors because they had to be, and this did not affect their personalities (though, ok, some of the killing seemed unnecessary). I think Grahame-Smith did a fabulous job of taking the original characters and working them into his own.
Recommendations
If you are not offended by a reworking of the classics, this is a good read. It is not a page-turner type of book, but don’t let that stop you from reading it.
Going Deeper
In some ways I felt that the savagery of the characters (the warriors) could represent the social underpinnings of Austen’s time. If one went against the society’s norms or customs, the person would be shunned; it wasn’t always the friendliest of times. It didn’t bother me that Pride and Prejudice had been reworked; in fact, I felt like I should have read Pride and Prejudice before (or, I guess, after) this book so that I could better compare the two stories. This book actually made me WANT to reread the classic, which I think is a feat in itself, since I am not a classics reader.
I liked and I am a faithful Austen reader. I was able to separate the two but thought Seth did a fantastic job of weaving his story in the middle of the original story. It was a fun read
Felicia, I agree it was a fun read, but I didn’t realize how much I liked it until I started writing the review.
Great review, love the 6 words especially
I just can’t bring myself to read this. I’m too much the purist, and well…I hate zombies 
But I’m glad you liked it!
Dearest Name Twin, thank you! And if you’re a purist, I would say do not read it. I’m not a fan of zombies either, but I do enjoy stepping out of my comfort zone every now and again.
I really enjoyed this book. I picked it up because the title made me laugh. I was a bit worried about the reworking of a classic too, but I think in this case, it worked quite well. I am not so sure about all the new reworkings that keep popping up now though. There is such thing as “too much of a good thing” or “over flooding” the market.
I am glad you liked this book
Rachel, I agree. Although I liked this book, I don’t think I would pick up another “reworked” book.
I loved this book, it had me howling for hours! For me it was a page turner. I just loved the wacky humor.
Missie, are you familiar with Pride and Prejudice? I felt like I would have liked this book better (and perhaps been able to pick up more on the humor) if I were more acquainted with the original.
Thanks for posting this, It’s just what I was looking for on bing. I’d much rather hear opinions from an individual, rather than a corporate site, that’s why I like blogs so much. Thanks!
Pingback: Books Read in May « Redefinition Mission